The one clear thing to come out of this covid pandemic is that it is baffling. To be sure I had chosen the right word, I looked up " to baffle". The answer was, as I thought.
The virus is indeed perplexing We still don't have a full handle on how it spreads, mutates, damages, stays away and for how long.
It is puzzling because it differs so much from one person to another. Some don't even get symptoms yet have antibodies. Some get a cough, some don't. Some just lose sense of smell. Some die. Some don't.
It is bewildering, because guidelines keep changing and sometimes from one week to the next, so you can never be 100% certain you are following the correct path. If you cross a border from England to Scotland or from Wales to Northern Ireland, the guidelines can change in a second. Why can't we all in the United Kingdom be doing the same thing to avoid confusion, another definition of baffle.
It is certainly bemusing, the way the guidelines change from day to day and week to week. Stay home to avoid people, but go out to exercise. Work from home, but go to work, then try to work from home. Wear a mask, but don't because masks don't really work. Don't meet in groups of more than six, but go to a pub and mix with many more. Frequent pubs but not after 10pm. One thing we have learned is that the virus must like a late night and does damage after 10pm. It lurks behind bushes waiting for a 7th person to join a group of six. It doesn't like soap. It hates the long jump of 2 metres. It doesn't like bubbles or alcohol (note to self - to buy some champagne as a safe deterrent).
In all seriousness, a second full lockdown could do so much damage economically, let alone cause more deaths from other causes and the rise of mental health issues. The cure could be worse than the disease. I know our government has been heavily criticised for the way they have handled things, but I doubt any other government would have got it right either. Covid-19 is truly baffling and may baffle us for some time to come.
Boris' rousing speech to the nation last night made the same point over and over. It's a delicate balance between stopping the virus spreading out of hand and still allowing us some freedom before we all go bonkers. It's not ideal, it has its flaws, but it is a compromise. We shouldn't need to go into full lockdown if everyone did their bit, stopped being selfish and not seeing beyond their own noses. The non-believing "there is no virus, it's all a conspiracy to boost the pharmaceutical industry" brigade should also stop knitting yogurt, moon-gazing and hugging trees and get real. So it's noses to the grindstone, shoulders to the wheel and a massive effort to roll that heavy weight of a virus back into touch. I'm in. Are you?
2 comments:
With the "rule of six" in my mind the other night, I watched Leicester City play Burnley on television. Apparently they were following the "rule of twenty two" + substitutes, coaching staff, referee and linesmen. As Americans say - Go figure.
With regard to The English Trump, I never refer to him by his first name. To me he will always be Johnson. After all, he is not lovable and cuddly, not a roguish Honey Monster, not someone endowed with unusual intelligence or likable eccentric character traits. The guy is a clown who is utterly out of his depth. At Eton he was always known by his first name - Alexander. His middle name adoption was probably a cynical ploy to help him achieve his ambition - "King of the World".
And for what it is worth, of course I am "in".
My sentiments exactly.
Briony
x
Post a Comment